4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Shared circulation in parabiosis leads to the transfer of bone phenotype from gld to the wild-type mice

期刊

CELLULAR IMMUNOLOGY
卷 233, 期 2, 页码 133-139

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2005.04.010

关键词

antigens; CD95; autoimmunity; bone marrow cells; parabiosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have previously shown that mice with generalised lymphoproliferative disorder (gla) have increased bone mass in addition to autoimmune disease characterised by the accumulation of double negative (dn) T lymphocytes (CD3(+)CD4(-)CD8(-)CD45R(+)). To further explore the association of the immune disorder with the bone phenotype of gld mice, we established parabiotic circulation between gld and wild-type animals (C57BL/6, 136). One week after the surgery, the proportion of dn T lymphocytes increased in peripheral blood, bone marrow, spleen, and lymph nodes of wild-type members of the B6-gld parabiotic pair and decreased in tissues of gld pair members. The mixing of cells continued during four weeks of parabiosis. Number of osteoclast-like (OCL) cells in bone marrow cultures from a wild-type member of B6-gld parabiotic pair at the end of the first week decreased from 266 52 to 120 +/- 5 OCL/cm(2), P < 0.05, comparable with gld mice (99 21 OCL/cm(2)), while the number of osteoblast colonies did not change. After four weeks, number of OCL cells formed from the bone marrow of 136 parabiotic mice was still similar to the number of OCL cells in their gld counterparts (150 +/- 18 and 131 +/- 24 OCL/cm(2), respectively). In addition, the number of osteoblast colonies in B6 members of B6-gld parabiotic pairs increased (from 6:4:2 to 18 I colonies/cm(2), P < 0.05) thus resembling the cell cultures of g1d mice (18 +/- 1 colonies/cm(2)). Taken together, these data show that the circulation of cells, including dn T lymphocytes established by parabiosis confers the osteoclast and osteoblast phenotype of g1d to wild-type animals. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据