4.2 Article

Suppression subtractive hybridization as a basis to assess Mycoplasma agalactiae and Mycoplasma bovis genomic diversity and species-specific sequences

期刊

MICROBIOLOGY-SGM
卷 151, 期 -, 页码 475-489

出版社

SOC GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.27590-0

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The phylogenically related Mycoplasma agalactiae and Mycoplasma bovis species are two ruminant pathogens difficult to differentiate and for which a limited amount of sequence data are available. To assess the degree of genomic diversity existing between and within these mycoplasma species, sets of DNA fragments specific for M. bovis type-strain PG45 or for M. agalactiae type-strain PG2 were isolated by suppression subtractive hybridization and used as probes on a panel of M. agalactiae and M. bovis field isolates. Results indicated that approximately 70% of the DNA fragments specific to one or the other type strain are represented in all field isolates of the corresponding species. Only one M. bovis isolate, which was first classified as M. agalactiae, reacted with 15% of the PG2-specific probes, while several M. agalactiae isolates reacted with 15% of the PG45-specific probes. Sequence analyses indicated that most of the genomic diversity observed within one species is related to ORFs with (i) no homologies to proteins recorded in the databases or (ii) homologies to proteins encoded by restriction modification systems. Reminiscent of gene transfer as a means for genomic diversity, a PG45-specific DNA fragment with significant homologies to a central protein of an integrative conjugative element of Mycoplasma fermentans (ICEF) was found in most M. bovis field isolates and in a few M. agalactiae isolates. Finally, sequences encoding part of DNA polymerase III were found in both sets of M. agalactiae- and M. bovis-specific DNA fragments and were used to design a species-specific PCR assay for the identification and differentiation of M. agalactiae and M. bovis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据