4.2 Article

Diversity within the Campylobacter jejuni type I restriction -: modification loci

期刊

MICROBIOLOGY-SGM
卷 151, 期 -, 页码 337-351

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.27327-0

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The type I restriction-modification (hsd) systems of 73 Campylobacter jejuni strains were characterized according to their DNA and amino acid sequences, and/or gene organization. A number of new genes were identified which are not present in the sequenced strain NCTC 11168. The closely related organism Helicobacter pylori has three type I systems; however, no evidence was found that C. jejuni strains contain multiple type I systems, although hsd loci are present in at least two different chromosomal locations. Also, unlike H. pylori, intervening ORFs are present, in some strains, between hsdR and hsdS and between hsdS and hsdM. No definitive function can be ascribed to these ORFs, designated here as rloA-H ((R) under bar-(l) under bar inked (O) under bar RF) and mloA-B ((M) under bar-(l) under bar inked (O) under bar RF). Based on parsimony analysis of amino acid sequences to assess character relatedness, the C. jejuni type I R-M systems are assigned to one of three families: 'IAB', 'IC' or 'IF'. This study confirms that HsdM proteins within a family are highly conserved but share little homology with HsdM proteins from other families. The 'IC' hsd loci are > 99% identical at the nucleoticle level, as are the 'IF' hsd loci. Additionally, whereas the nucleoticle sequences of the 'IAB' hsdR and hsdM genes show a high degree of similarity, the nucleoticle sequences of the 'IAB' hsdS and no genes vary considerably. This diversity suggests that recombination between 'IAB' hsd loci would lead not only to new hsdS alleles but also to the exchange of no genes; five C. jejuni hsd loci are presumably the result of such recombination. The importance of these findings with regard to the evolution of C. jejuni type I R-M systems is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据