4.5 Article

Androgenic induction of growth and differentiation in the rodent uterus involves the modulation of estrogen-regulated genetic pathways

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 146, 期 2, 页码 564-578

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2004-1132

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The androgen receptor (AR) is expressed in the uterus; however, the role of AR in female reproductive physiology is poorly understood. Here we examined the effects of androgens on uterine growth and gene expression in adult ovariectomized rats. Nonaromatizable AR-selective agonists potently stimulate hypertrophy and induce significant myometrial expansion distinct from that induced by 17beta-estradiol (E2). In the endometrium, androgens only modestly increase epithelial cell height and antagonize the trophic effects of E2. To identify underlying mechanisms, global changes in RNA levels 24 h after stimulation with E2 and 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) were compared. A total of 491 genes were differentially expressed after E2 treatment, including key regulators of tissue remodeling, cell signaling, metabolism, and gene expression. Of the 164 transcripts regulated by DHT, 86% were also affected by E2, including trophic genes like IGF-I and epithelial secretory genes such as uterocalin. In estrogen receptor (ER)alpha knockout mice, DHT cannot induce uterine growth, suggesting a key role for ERalpha. However, DHT appears not to activate ERalpha directly because DHT induction of IGF-I is blocked by the AR antagonist bicalutamide, and multiple genes regulated directly by ERalpha were not induced by DHT. The similarity between estrogens and androgens instead could reflect general trophic signaling in reproductive tissues because 93 of the 503 genes regulated in the uterus are similarly affected during prostate growth. Thus androgens regulate the trophic environment and architecture of the rodent uterus via a gene expression program that is overlapping but distinct from the estrogen response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据