4.3 Article

Quantification of Bifidobacterium spp., Escherichia coli and Clostridium difficile in faecal samples of breast-fed and formula-fed infants by real-time PCR

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS
卷 243, 期 1, 页码 141-147

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.11.052

关键词

Bifidobacterium; Escherichia coli; Clostridium difficile; real-time PCR; intestinal microbiota; breastfeeding; infant formula

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To determine the influence of either exclusive breast-feeding or formula feeding on both composition and quantity of the gut microbiota in infants, we have developed real-time, quantitative PCR assays for the detection of Bifidobacterium spp. and Clostridium difficile. Furthermore, we have monitored the prevalence and counts of Escherichia coli by applying a previously described real-time PCR assay. We found all 100 infants tested to be colonized by Bifidobacterium spp. The bifidobacterial counts were comparable between the 50 breast-fed and 50 formula-fed infants with median values of 10.56 log(10) and 10.24 log(10) CFU g(-1) wet weight faeces, respectively. C. difficile was detected in 14% of the breast-fed and 30% of the formula-fed infants. In addition, the C. difficile counts were significantly lower in breast-fed infants than in the formula-fed group (median values of 3.28 log(10) and 7.43 log(10) CFU g(-1), respectively; p = 0.03). The prevalence of E. coli in the breast-fed and formula-fed group was 80% and 94%, respectively. Also, the E coli counts in colonized infants was significantly lower in the breast-fed infants than in the formula-fed group (median values of 9.11 log(10) and 9.57 log(10) CFU g(-1), respectively; p = 0.004). We conclude that the prevalence and counts of C. difficile as well as E. coli are significantly lower in the gut microbiota of breast-fed infants than in that of formula-fed infants, whereas the prevalence and counts of Bifidobacterium spp. is similar among both groups. (C) 2004 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据