4.6 Article

Protective effect of active oxygen scavengers on protein degradation and photochemical function in photosystern I submembrane fractions during light stress

期刊

FEBS JOURNAL
卷 272, 期 4, 页码 892-902

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2004.04512.x

关键词

photosystem 1; submembrane fraction; active oxygen; P700; light stress

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The protective role of reactive oxygen scavengers against photodamage was studied in isolated photosystem (PS) I submembrane fractions illuminated (2000 muE.m(-2).s(-1)) for various periods at 4 degreesC. The photochemical activity of the submembrane fractions measured as P700 photooxidation was significantly protected in the presence of histidine or n-propyl gallate. Chlorophyll photobleaching resulting in a decrease of absorbance and fluorescence, and a blue-shift of both absorbance and fluorescence maximum in the red region, was also greatly delayed in the presence of these scavengers. Western blot analysis revealed the light harvesting antenna complexes of PSI, Lhca2 and Lhca1, were more susceptible to strong light when compared to Lhca3 and Lhca4. The reaction-center proteins PsaB, PsaC, and PsaE were most sensitive to strong illumination while other polypeptides were less affected. Addition of histidine or n-propyl gallate lead to significant protection of reaction-center proteins as well as Lhca against strong illumination. Circular dichroism (CD) spectra revealed that the alpha-helix content decreased with increasing period of light exposure, whereas beta-strands, turns, and unordered structure increased. This unfolding was prevented with the addition of histidine or n-propyl gallate even after 10 h of strong illumination. Catalase or superoxide dismutase could not minimize the alteration of PSI photochemical activity and structure due to photodamage. The specific action of histidine and n-propyl gallate indicates that O-1(2) was the main form of reactive oxygen species responsible for strong light-induced damage in PSI submembrane fractions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据