4.7 Article

Effects of long-term treatment with loop diuretics on bone mineral density, calcitropic hormones and bone turnover

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 257, 期 2, 页码 176-184

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01434.x

关键词

biochemical bone markers; bone mineral density; loop diuretics; osteoporosis; postmenopausal women; PTH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Loop diuretics (LD) are widely used in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases and disorders with fluid accumulation. LD are known to increase renal calcium losses and may thereby affect calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism. Objective. We studied to what extent long-term treatment with LD affects calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism. Design and subjects. In a cross-sectional design we compared 140 postmenopausal women treated with a LD for more than 2 years with 140 age-matched women not in diuretic therapy. Results. Treatment with LD was associated with significantly increased urinary calcium, plasma parathyroid hormone (PTH) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels. Per 40 mg day(-1) of furosemide, urinary calcium was increased by 17% (P < 0.05) and plasma PTH levels were increased by 28% (P = 0.04). Users of LD had a 17% higher body weight (P < 0.001) compared with nonusers. This was due to a 32% higher fat mass (P < 0.001) and a 6% higher lean tissue mass (P < 0.001). Moreover, users of LD had a higher bone mineral density (BMD) at the spine (+7.5%, P < 0.001), hip (+4.8%, P = 0.004), forearm (+3.7%, P = 0.01) and whole body (+2.5%, P = 0.06). However, after adjustment for body weight differences, BMD did not differ between groups. Nevertheless, duration of LD treatment was positively associated with BMD at the spine (P = 0.03) and whole body (P < 0.05). BMD at the spine increases by 0.3% per 1 year of treatment. Conclusions. The increased renal calcium losses in users of LD are compensated for by a PTH-dependent increase in 1,25(OH)(2)D levels. Thereby calcium balance remains neutral without major effects on bone metabolism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据