4.7 Article

Early postoperative substitution procedure of the antioxidant ascorbic acid

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITIONAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 104-108

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2004.10.005

关键词

ascorbic acid; substitution; postoperative ICU; antioxidant; oxidative stress

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Postoperatively reduced concentration of ascorbic acid (AA) in plasma (less than or equal to45.5 mumol/l (less than or equal to800 mug/dl)) is commonly interpreted as increased metabolic requirements, but it is not shown yet that the patient benefits from a substitution toward normal levels of AA. This is due to the missing knowledge on how to substitute AA effectively to normal plasma values in postoperative patients. Therefore, a postoperative AA substitution procedure overnight to normal values in plasma was investigated on a postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) in a university hospital. Material and Methods: Fifty-seven operated patients were randomly assigned to a control- or intervention group (CG and IG, respectively). In all patients, the AA plasma concentration was analysed preoperatively and on the first three postoperative days. Patients of the IG received AA intravenously up to four times within 12 h depending upon the initial AA concentration (< 34.1 mumol/l (4 x 500 mg AA); less than or equal to 56.8 mumol/l (2 x 500 mg AA); less than or equal to 68.2 mumol/l (1 x 500 mg AA)). Results: The preoperative and early postoperative AA values did not differ between the groups. On the first postoperative day in both groups the plasma concentration was lowered (less than or equal to 45.5 mumol/l) in 23 of all patients (CG: 85.18%; IG: 82.14%). In the IG, the dosage regime increased the AA plasma concentration to greater than or equal to 45.5 mumol/l in 26 of 28 (92.86%) patients overnight. Conclusion: The investigated substitution procedure is sufficient to increase AA plasma concentration overnight to normal or high normal values in postoperative ICU patients. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据