4.4 Article

Mutations that rescue the paralysis of Caenorhabditis elegans ric-8 (synembryn) mutants activate the Gαs pathway and define a third major branch of the synaptic signaling network

期刊

GENETICS
卷 169, 期 2, 页码 631-649

出版社

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.032334

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [MH62400, R01 MH062400] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To identify hypothesized missing components of the synaptic G alpha(o)-G alpha(q), signaling network, which tightly regulates neurotransmitter release, we undertook two large for-ward genetic screens in the model organism C. elegans and focused first on mutations that strongly rescue the paralysis of ric-8(md303) reduction-of-function mutants, previously shown to be defective in G alpha(q) pathway activation. Through high-resolution mapping followed by sequence analysis, we show that these mutations affect four genes. Two activate the Gaq pathway through gain-of-function mutations in Gaq; however, all of the remaining mutations activate components of the G alpha(s) pathway, including G alpha(s), adenylyl cyclase, and protein kinase A. Pharmacological assays suggest that the Gas pathway-activating mutations increase steady-state neurotransmitter release, and the strongly impaired neurotransmitter release of ric-8(md303) mutants is rescued to greater than wild-type levels by the strongest G alpha(s) pathway activating mutations. Using transgene induction studies, we show that activating the G alpha(s) pathway in adult animals rapidly induces hyperactive locomotion and rapidly rescues the paralysis of the ric-8 mutant. Using cell-specific promoters we show that neuronal, but not muscle, G alpha(s) pathway activation is sufficient to rescue ric-8(md303)'s paralysis. Our results appear to link RIC-8 (synembryn) and a third major G alpha pathway, the G alpha(s) pathway, with the previously discovered G alpha(o) and G alpha(q) pathways of the synaptic signaling network.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据