期刊
DENTAL MATERIALS
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 110-124出版社
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.01.003
关键词
adhesion; etch-and-rinse; self-etch; microtensile bond strength; polymerization shrinkage; durability; aging
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect polymerization contraction stress may have on bond durability. Methods: Bonding effectiveness was assessed by micro-tensile bond strength testing (muTBS) and electron microscopy. The muTBS to flat dentin surfaces and in standardized cavities was determined (this after 1 day as well as 1 year water storage). Six adhesives representing all current classes were applied: two etch-and-rinse (OptiBond FL, Kerr; Scotchbond 1, 3M ESPE), two self-etch (Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray; Adper Prompt, 3M, ESPE) and two glass-ionomer (Fuji Bond LC, GC; Reactmer, Shofu) adhesives. Results: The conventional 3-step etch-and-rinse adhesive OptiBond FL bonded most effectively to dentin, and appeared insensitive to polymerization shrinkage stress and water degradation. The 2-step self-etch adhesive Clearfit SE Bond most closely approached this superior bonding effectiveness and only slightly lost bond strength after 1-year water exposure. The 2-step etch-and-rinse adhesive Scotchbond 1 and the 'strong' 1-step self-etch adhesive Adper Prompt appeared very sensitive to cavity configuration and water-aging effects. The 2-step resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive Fuji Bond LC only suffered from shrinkage stress, but not from 1-year water-exposure. Remarkable also is the apparent repairability of the 'mild' 1-step glass-ionomer adhesive Reactmer when stored for 1 year in water, in spite of the very tow 1-day muTBS. Significance: Simplified bonding procedures do not necessarily imply improved bonding performance, especially in the tong term. (C) 2004 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据