4.4 Article

Intranasal CpG-Oligodeoxynucleotide is a potent adjuvant of vaccine against Helicobacter pylori, and t helper 1 type response and interferon-γ correlate with the protection

期刊

HELICOBACTER
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 71-79

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2005.00293.x

关键词

Helicobacter pylori; vaccine; CpG-digodeoxynucleotide; interferon-gamma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Although a series of vaccines against Helicobacter pylori have emerged in the past 10 years, the mechanism involved in their protective effect is yet to be elucidated, and more effective vaccine adjuvants remain to be developed. In this study, CpG-oligodeoxynucleotide (CpG-ODN) was investigated as a new candidate for a H. pylori vaccine adjuvant. Furthermore, the role of T helper 1 (Th1) type response and interferon (IFN)-gamma in the protective immunity was explored. Methods. C57BL/6 mice and IFN-gamma knockout mice were intranasally or orally immunized with H. pylori whole cell sonicate (WCS)/CpG-ODN and challenged with different doses [5 x 10(8) and 5 x 10(6) colony-forming units (CFU)] of H. pylori. The protective effect was assessed as the percentage of noninfected mice. The responsive antibodies and cytokines were analyzed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and flow cytometry. Results. The prevention rates against H. pylori infection in mice intranasally immunized with WCS plus CpG-ODN were dramatically higher than those in sham-immunized mice (70% vs. 0%, challenged with 5 x 10(8) CFU H. pylori; 90% vs. 20%, challenged with 5 x 10(6) CFU H. pylori). Significantly higher levels of immunoglobulin G2a (IgG2a) and IFN-gamma were detected in the mice immunized with WCS/CpG than in sham-immunized controls. However, vaccination failed to effectively protect IFN-gamma knockout mice challenged with H. pylori. Conclusions. CpG-ODN given intranasally is a potent adjuvant for development of a H. pylori vaccine. Th1-type response and IFN-gamma are involved in the protection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据