4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Effect of eyestalk-ablation on circulating ecdysteroids in hemolymph of snow crabs, Chionoecetes opilio:: Physiological evidence for a terminal molt

期刊

INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY
卷 45, 期 1, 页码 166-171

出版社

SOC INTEGRATIVE COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1093/icb/45.1.166

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bering Sea snow crabs (Chionoecetes opilio) are a commercially important crab harvested in the Bering Sea. Optimal management of this species requires an understanding of the biology of this crab that is currently incomplete. Fisheries managers apply a continuous growth model in their management of snow crab, which assumes that male crabs increase in size throughout their lifespan. Male snow crabs undergo a morphometric molt that leads to a disproportionate increase in chelae size and it is still debated whether this molt is associated with a terminal molt. This study was conducted to determine whether adult male C opilio are anecdysic. Using current knowledge of the hormonal regulation of crustacean growth, snow crab physiology was manipulated to induce an increase in molting hormones (ecdysteroids). Since female snow crabs are known to undergo a terminal molt after attaining reproductive maturity, we compared ecdysteroid levels in eyestalk-ablated terminally molted females, small-clawed males and large-clawed males. Snow crabs were collected from the Bering Sea and maintained in circulating seawater at approximately 6° C. Animals were either eyestalk-ablated or left intact. Ecdysteroid levels in hemolymph were quantified using an enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA). Circulating ecdysteroids were significantly higher in small-clawed male crabs when compared to large-clawed males or terminally molted females. Eyestalk-ablation increased circulating ecdysteroids in small-clawed males, but had no significant effect on circulating ecdysteroids in large-clawed males or in terminally molted females.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据