4.6 Article

Rapamycin-treated, alloantigen-pulsed host dendritic cells induce Ag-specific T cell regulation and prolong graft survival

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 5, 期 2, 页码 228-236

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1600-6143.2004.00673.x

关键词

antigen presentation/processing; dendritic cell; tolerance; transplantation

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL69725] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI/DK51698, AI41011, AI55027] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK49745] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tolerogenic properties of dendritic cells (DC), particularly those in the immature state, and their therapeutic potential are increasingly being recognized. Among several distinct approaches to generate stably immature DC, pharmacologic manipulation stands out as a promising and clinically applicable option. We have shown recently that the immunophilin ligand rapamycin (Rapa) can inhibit DC maturation and their effector functions. Here, we examined the impact of Rapa exposure on subsequent alloantigen (Ag) presentation by myeloid DC via the indirect pathway. Rapa-treated, allogeneic lysate-pulsed host DC (Rapa-DC) were inferior stimulators of syngeneic T cells, compared to lysate-pulsed control DC. Rapa exposure did not block alloAg uptake by DC nor impair their in vivo homing to splenic T cell areas after adoptive transfer. T cells primed by Rapa-treated, alloAg-pulsed DC showed decreased capacity to produce IL-2 and IFNgamma and were hyporesponsive to subsequent challenge via both the direct and indirect pathways, in an Ag-specific manner. When infused 1 week before transplantation, these Rapa-DC significantly prolonged alloAg-specific heart graft survival. This effect was reversed by systemic IL-2 administration but enhanced by either repeated infusion of the cells or a short post-transplant course of FK506. These therapeutic effects, achieved by targeting both major pathways of allorecognition, provide the basis for a clinically applicable strategy to suppress graft rejection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据