4.5 Article

Modulation of mammalian inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor isoforms by calcium: A role of calcium sensor region

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 88, 期 2, 页码 1056-1069

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.104.049601

关键词

-

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS038082, R01 NS38082] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the accompanying article, we compared main functional properties of the three mammalian inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (InsP(3)R) isoforms. In this article we focused on modulation of mammalian InsP(3)R isoforms by cytosolic Ca2+. We found that: 1), when recorded in the presence of 2 muM InsP(3) and 0.5 mM ATP all three mammalian InsP(3)R isoforms display bell-shaped Ca2+ dependence in physiological range of Ca2+ concentrations (pCa 8-5); 2), in the same experimental conditions InsP(3)R3 is most sensitive to modulation by Ca2+ (peak at 107 nM Ca2+), followed by InsP(3)R2 (peak at 154 nM Ca2+), and then by InsP(3)R1 (peak at 257 nM Ca2+); 3), increase in ATP concentration to 5 mM had no significant effect of Ca2+ dependence of InsP(3)R1 and InsP(3)R2; 4), increase in ATP concentration to 5 mM converted Ca2+ dependence of InsP(3)R3 from narrow'' shape to square'' shape; 5), ATP-induced change in the shape of InsP(3)R3 Ca2+ dependence was mainly due to an >200-fold reduction in the apparent affinity of the Ca2+-inhibitory site; 6), the apparent Ca2+ affinity of the Ca2+ sensor region (Cas) determined in biochemical experiments is equal to 0.23 muM Ca2+ for RT1-Cas, 0.16 muM Ca2+ for RT2-Cas, and 0.10 muM Ca2+ for RT3-Cas; and 7), Ca2+ sensitivity of InsP(3)R1 and InsP(3)R3 isoforms recorded in the presence of 2 muM InsP(3) and 0.5 mM ATP or 2 muM InsP(3) and 5 mM ATP can be exchanged by swapping their Cas regions. Obtained results provide novel information about functional properties of mammalian InsP(3)R isoforms and support the importance of the Ca2+ sensor region (Cas) in determining the sensitivity of InsP(3)R isoforms to modulation by Ca2+.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据