4.7 Article

Down-regulation of CD40 and CD80 on B cells in patients with life-threatening systemic lupus erythematosus after successful treatment with rituximab

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 44, 期 2, 页码 176-182

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh443

关键词

rituximab; anti-CD20 antibody; systemic lupus erythematosus; central nervous system lupus; autoimmune haemolytic anaemia; CD40; CD80

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by autoreactive T cells and polyclonally activated B cells that produce autoantibodies. Five SLE patients who failed to respond to conventional immunosuppressants were treated with anti-CD20 antibody (rituximab) and their clinical manifestations and laboratory data were evaluated, including phenotypic analysis of B cells. Methods. Rituximab (375 mg/m(2)) was administered weekly for 2 weeks in five SLE patients who developed severe manifestations despite intensive treatment. Results. Rituximab resulted in rapid improvement (within several days) in clinical manifestations such as consciousness disorder, seizures, progressive sensory disorder, haemolytic crisis, cardiac function and laboratory data. The effects lasted 20 months in one patient; other patients were in remission for more than 6 months. Flow cytometric analysis revealed down-regulation of CD40 and CD80 expression on CD19-positive B cells 1 week after infusion of rituximab, and such down-regulation was seen for more than 7 months in two patients. Conclusions. Our pilot study provides sufficient evidence of excellent tolerability and high efficacy of rituximab therapy in refractory SLE. Rituximab not only reduced B-cell number and IgG levels but down-regulated CD40 and CD80 on B cells, suggesting possible disturbance of T-cell activation through these costimulatory molecules. Reduction of both quantity and quality of B cells suggests that rituximab could improve the disease course in patients with refractory SLE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据