4.7 Article

On using visibility correlations to probe the HI distribution from the dark ages to the present epoch - I. Formalism and the expected signal

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08604.x

关键词

cosmology : theory; diffuse radiation; large-scale structure of Universe

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Redshifted 21-cm radiation originating from the cosmological distribution of neutral hydrogen (H I) appears as background radiation in low-frequency radio observations. The angular and frequency domain fluctuations in this radiation carry information concerning cosmological structure formation. We propose that correlations between visibilities measured at different baselines and frequencies in radio-interferometric observations be used to quantify the statistical properties of these fluctuations. This has an inherent advantage over other statistical estimators in that it deals directly with the visibilities which are the primary quantities measured in radio-interferometric observations. Also, the visibility correlation has a very simple relation with the power spectrum. We present estimates of the expected signal for nearly the entire post-recombination era, from the dark ages to the present epoch. The epoch of reionization, where HI has a patchy distribution, has a distinct signature where the signal is determined by the size of the discrete ionized regions. The signal at other epochs, where HI follows the dark matter, is determined largely by the power spectrum of dark matter fluctuations. The signal is strongest for baselines where the antenna separations are within a few hundred times the wavelength of observation, and an optimal strategy would preferentially sample these baselines. In the frequency domain, for most baselines the visibilities at two different frequencies are uncorrelated beyond Deltav similar to 1 MHz, a signature which, in principle, would allow the HI signal to be easily distinguished from the continuum sources of contamination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据