4.6 Article

The topology of bulges in the long stem of the flavivirus 3′ stem-loop is a major determinant of RNA replication competence

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 79, 期 4, 页码 2309-2324

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.79.4.2309-2324.2005

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

All flavivirus genomes contain a 3'terminal stem-loop secondary structure (3'SL) formed by the most downstream similar to100 nucleotides (nt) of the viral RNA. The 3'SL is required for virus replication and has been shown to bind both virus-coded and cellular proteins. Results of the present study using an infectious DNA for WN virus strain 956 initially demonstrated that the dengue virus serotype 2 (DEN2) 3'SL nucleotide sequence could not substitute for that of the WN 3'SL to support WN genome replication. To determine what WN virus-specific 3'SL nucleotide sequences were required for WN virus replication, WN virus 3'SL nucleotide sequences were selectively deleted and replaced by analogous segments of the DEN2 3'SL nucleotide sequence such that the overall 3'SL secondary structure was not disrupted. Top and bottom portions of the WN virus 3'SL were defined according to previous studies Q. L. Blackwell and M. A. Brinton, J. Virol. 71:6433-6444, 1997; L. Zeng, L., B. Falgout, and L. Markoff, J. Virol. 72:7510-7522, 1998). A bulge in the top portion of the long stem of the WN 3'SL was essential for replication of mutant WN RNAs, and replication-defective RNAs failed to produce negative strands in transfected cells. Introduction of a second bulge into the bottom portion of the long stem of the wild-type WN 3'SL markedly enhanced the replication competence of WN virus in mosquito cells but had no effect on replication in mammalian cells. This second bulge was identified as a host cell-specific enhancer of flavivirus replication. Results suggested that bulges and their topological location within the long stem of the 3'SL are primary determinants of replication competence for flavivirus genomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据