期刊
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 153-157出版社
BLACKWELL MUNKSGAARD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00651.x
关键词
artificial periodontal pocket; hand instrumentation; periodontal treatment; removal of root substance; ultrasonic instrumentation
Objective: The aim of the present study was to assess the removal of root substance with the Vector(TM)-system depending on different irrigation fluids and to compare the results with conventional methods for root debridement. Material and Methods: Forty extracted human teeth were treated using four different methods: Vector(TM)-system with polishing fluid and metal curette (VP), Vector(TM)-system with abrasive fluid and metal curette (VA), conventional ultrasonic system (U) with insert tip P and hand instrument. Treatment of the calculus-free root surfaces was carried out for a total of 12 min. using an artificial periodontal pocket. At intervals of 120 s, the removal of dental hard tissues was assessed using a three-dimensional (3D) laser scanning device and the Match 3D software with an accuracy of 0.00001 mm(3). Results: No difference in the removal of root substance with the hand instrument (0.0055 mm(3)/s) and the Vector(TM)-system using the abrasive fluid (0.0044 mm(3)/s) could be observed (p=0.51). Using these two systems, a larger amount of root substance (p<0.05) was removed compared with the other methods (U: 0.0023 mm(3)/s, VP: 0.0022 mm(3)/s), which did not differ from each other (p=0.76). Conclusions: The present study indicates that the Vector(TM)-system in combination with polishing fluid or conventional ultrasonics might be used for root debridement without extensive root substance removal.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据