4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Testing functional performance in people with Parkinson disease

期刊

PHYSICAL THERAPY
卷 85, 期 2, 页码 134-141

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOC
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/85.2.134

关键词

Berg Balance Scale; Backward Functional Reach Test; Forward Functional Reach Test; gait speed; Parkinson disease; Timed Up & Go Test; Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose. Although the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is the most common performance measure for people with Parkinson disease (PD), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Forward Functional Reach Test (FFR), Backward Functional Reach Test (BFR), Timed Up & Go Test (TUG), and gait speed may be used to quantify some aspects of functional performance not measured by the UPDRS. The purpose of this study was to describe the relationship among a set of tests of balance, walking performance, and mobility in people with PD. Subjects. Twenty-five community-dwelling adults (11 female, 14 male) with a diagnosis of PD were recruited from PD support groups in southeastern Wisconsin and consented to participate in the study. The mean age of the participants was 76 years (SD=7). The average Hoehn and Yahr Stage Scale score was 2. Methods. Functional abilities of each subject were assessed with the UPDRS, BBS, FFR, BFR, TUG, and gait speed. Spearman and Pearson correlations were performed. Results. The UPDRS total score was correlated with the BBS (r=-.64, P<.001), FFR (r=-.52, P<.05), and TUG (r=.50, P<.05) measurements. The BBS is the only test of functional performance where scores correlate with all other functional tests and the UPDRS. Discussion and Conclusions. The UPDRS total score may not reflect a comprehensive measure of mobility in people with PD. Because the BBS scores correlate both with UPDRS scores and with scores of all other tests of functional performance, the BBS appears to be a good overall measure of function in this population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据