4.6 Article

Investigation of third-order nonlinear optical properties of NNDC-doped PMMA thin films by Z-scan technique

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-011-6628-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation [60778037, 50772059, 11004123]
  2. Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of China [200539]
  3. Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2009GQ007]
  4. Youth Scientist Fund of Shandong Province [BS2011CL025]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [20100470040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel chalcone derivative, (2E)-1-(2,4-di- chloro-5-fluorophenyl)-3-[4-dimethylamino)phenyl]prop-2-en-1-one, abbreviated as NNDC, was prepared and characterized by elemental analyses, infrared (IR) and proton nuclear magnetic resonance (H-1 NMR) spectrum, and thermal analyses. The NNDC-doped poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) thin films with five different doping concentrations by weight were prepared by using a spin-coating method. Their linear optical properties were investigated by using a prism coupling measuring system. The third-order nonlinear optical properties of NNDC in 1,2-dichloroethane (NNDC/1,2-dichloroethane) solution and NNDC-doped PMMA (NNDC/PMMA) films were investigated by using the laser Z-scan technique with 20 ps pulses at 532 nm. A self-focusing effect was observed from the Z-scan curves for solution and thin films and the nonlinear refractive index of the film increases with the increase of the doping concentration. In addition, nonlinear absorption was negligible for all samples. The magnitude of third-order nonlinear refraction index n (2) and the third-order nonlinear susceptibility chi ((3)) for thin films were 10(-15) m(2)/W and 10(-9) esu, respectively, which are about three orders larger than that of NNDC/1,2-dichloroethane solution. Some necessary analyses were presented. The results show that this material is a promising candidate for application in the nonlinear optical devices at 532 nm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据