4.8 Article

Arsenic trioxide induces autophagic cell death in malignant glioma cells by upregulation of mitochondrial cell death protein BNIP3

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 24, 期 6, 页码 980-991

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208095

关键词

arsenic trioxide; autophagy; BNIP3; glioma; LC3

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA88936, CA106310] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arsenic trioxide (As2O3) has shown considerable efficacy in treating hematological malignancies with induction of programmed cell death (PCD) type I, apoptosis. However, the mechanisms underlying the antitumor effect of As2O3 on solid tumors are poorly defined. Previously, we reported that As2O3 induced autophagic cell death (PCD type II) but not apoptosis in human malignant glioma cell lines. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the molecular pathway leading to autophagic cell death. In this study, we demonstrated that the cell death was accompanied by involvement of autophagy-specific marker, microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3), and damage of mitochondrial membrane integrity, but not by caspase activation. Analysis by cDNA microarray, RT-PCR, and Western blot showed that cell death members of Bcl-2 family, Bcl-2/adenovirus E1B 19-kDa- interacting protein 3 (BNIP3) and its homologue BNIP3-like (BNIP3L), were upregulated in As2O3-induced autophagic cell death. Exogenous expression of BNIP3, but not BNIP3L, induced autophagic cell death in malignant glioma cells without As2O3 treatment. When upregulation of BNIP3 induced by As2O3 was suppressed by a dominant-negative effect of the transmembrane-deleted BNIP3 (BNIP3DTM), autophagic cell death was inhibited. In contrast, BNIP3 transfection augmented As2O3-induced autophagic cell death. These results suggest that BNIP3 plays a central role in As2O3-induced autophagic cell death in malignant glioma cells. This study adds a new concept to characterize the pathways by which As2O3 acts to induce autophagic cell death in malignant glioma cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据