4.4 Article

Neuroprotective effect of 20(S)-ginseno side Rg3 on cerebral ischemia in rats

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 374, 期 2, 页码 92-97

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.10.030

关键词

20(S)-ginsenoside Rg(3); cerebral ischemia; energy metabolism; free radical; neuroprotection; mitchondrial

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study was conducted to investigate the neuroprotective effects of 20(S)-ginsenoside Rg(3) on focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model in male Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats was employed. The behavioral tests were used to evaluate the damage to central nervous system. The infarct area of brain was assessed in the brain slices stained with 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC). Hydrogen clearance techniques were used to monitor regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF), spectrophotometric assay methods were used to determine the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione-peroxidase (GSH-Px), contents of malondialdehyde (MDA) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) of the brain. Furthermore, the respiratory control ratio (RCR =State 3/State 4) was assessed in the brain mitochondria. The results showed that sublingual vein injection of 20(S)-ginsenoside Rg(3) at doses of 10 and 5 mg kg(-1), but not 2.5 mg kg(-1) exhibited significant neuroprotective effects on rats against focal cerebral ischemic injury by markedly decreasing neurological deficit scores, reducing the infarct area and enhancing the rCBF compared with the control group. At the same time, 20(S)-ginsenoside Rg(3) significantly improved mitochondrial energy metabolism, antagonized decreases in SOD and GSH-Px activities and increase in MDA level induced by cerebral ischemia. All these findings suggest that 20(S)-ginsenoside Rg(3) might provide neuroprotection against the cerebral ischemia-induced injury in rat brain through reducing lipid peroxides, scavenging free radicals and improving the energy metabolism. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据