4.7 Article

Image of Fomalhaut dust ring at 350 microns: The relative column density map shows pericenter-apocenter asymmetry

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 620, 期 1, 页码 L47-L50

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/428401

关键词

circumstellar matter; planetary systems; stars : individual (Fomalhaut)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have imaged the circumstellar disk of Fomalhaut at 350 mum wavelength, using SHARC II ( Submillimeter High Angular Resolution Camera II) at the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory. The spatial resolution of the raw images ( 9 ) has been enhanced by a factor of 3 using the HiRes deconvolution procedure. We find that at this wavelength and signal- to- noise ratio (similar to 12), the observed morphology is that of a simple inclined ring (i similar or equal to 70degrees), with little or no other apparent structure - this is the first observation that shows clearly the ring morphology of the disk. We have combined our 350 mum data with Spitzer Space Telescope images at 24, 70, and 160 mum in order to estimate the two- dimensional spatial variation of relative column density ( tau map) using our DISKFIT procedure. The tau map is based on the following physical assumptions: ( 1) the wavelength variation of opacity is the same throughout the disk, ( 2) the radial variation of dust temperature is dictated by the energy balance of individual grains in the stellar radiation field, and ( 3) the vertical scale height of the disk follows a power- law radial variation. The results confirm the ringlike morphology but also show that the geometric center is displaced from the star by about 8 AU and that the ring has an apocentric enhancement of approximately 14% in integrated column density. If we interpret the displacement in terms of elliptical orbital motion due to gravitational perturbation by an unseen planet, then the implied forced eccentricity is similar to 0.06; dynamical modeling then predicts an apocentric density enhancement consistent with that inferred from the tau map.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据