4.6 Article

The liver X receptor ligand T0901317 decreases amyloid β production in vitro and in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 280, 期 6, 页码 4079-4088

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M411420200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG 23304, AG 18558] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies indicate that oxysterols, which are ligands for the nuclear hormone liver X receptors (LXR), decrease amyloid 13 (Abeta) secretion in vitro. The effect was attributed primarily to the ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) transcriptionally up-regulated by ligand-activated LXRs. We now examined the effect of the synthetic LXR ligand T0901317, which can be used in vivo, on Abeta production in vitro and in APP23 transgenic mice. T0901317 applied to a variety of in vitro models, including immortalized fibroblasts from Tangier patients, and primary embryonic mouse neurons caused a concentration-dependent decrease in Abeta secretion, and this effect was increased by the addition of apolipoprotein A-I. The inhibition of Abeta production by T0901317 was cell-type specific, being more prominent in primary neurons than in non-neuronal cells. Tangier fibroblasts lacking a functional ABCA1 secreted more Abeta than control fibroblasts, thus demonstrating the role of ABCA1 in amyloid precursor protein (APP) processing and Abeta generation. T0901317 treatment of 11-week-old APP23 mice for 6 days showed a significant increase in ABCA1 expression and a decrease in the ratio of soluble APP (sAPP)beta- to sAPPalpha-cleavage products. Most importantly, the treatment caused a statistically significant reduction in the levels of soluble Abeta(40) and Abeta(42) in the brain of these mice. Our experiments demonstrate that T0901317 decreases amyloidogenic processing of APP in vitro and in vivo, thus supporting the search for potent and specific LXR ligands with properties allowing therapeutic application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据