4.6 Article

S100B increases proliferation in PC12 neuronal cells and reduces their responsiveness to nerve growth factor via Akt activation

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 280, 期 6, 页码 4402-4414

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M406440200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

S100B is a Ca2+-modulated protein of the EF-hand type expressed in high abundance in a restricted set of cell types including certain neuronal populations. S100B has been suggested to participate in cell cycle progression, and S100B levels are high in tumor cells, compared with normal parental cells. We expressed S100B in the neuronal cell line PC12, which normally does not express the protein, by the Tet-Off technique, and found the following: W proliferation was higher in S100B(+) PC12 cells than in S100B(-) PC12 cells; (ii) nerve growth factor (NGF), which decreased the proliferation of S100B- PC12 cells, was less effective in the case of S100B(+) PC12 cells; (iii) expression of S100B made PC12 cells resistant to the differentiating effect of NGF; and (iv) interruption of S100B expression did not result in an immediate restoration of PC12 cell sensitivity to the differentiating effect of NGF. Expression of S100B in PC12 cells resulted in activation of Akt; increased levels of p21(WAF1), an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk) 2 and a positive regulator of cdk4; increased p21(WAF1)-cyclin D1 complex formation; and increased phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma suppressor protein, Rb. These S100B-induced effects, as well as the reduced ability of S100B PC12 cells to respond to NGF, were dependent on Akt activation because they were remarkably reduced or abrogated in the presence of LY294002, an inhibitor of the Akt upstream kinase phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Thus, S100B might promote cell proliferation and interfere with NGF-induced PC12 cell differentiation by stimulating a p21(WAF1)/cyclin D1/cdk4/Rb/E2F pathway in an Akt-mediated manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据