4.6 Article

Multiple β1 integrins mediate enhancement of human airway smooth muscle cytokine secretion by fibronectin and type I collagen

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 174, 期 4, 页码 2258-2264

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.4.2258

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Altered airway smooth muscle (ASM) function and enrichment of the extracellular matrix (ECM) with interstitial collagen and fibronectin are major pathological features of airway remodeling in asthma. We have previously shown that these ECM components confer enhanced ASM proliferation in vitro, but their action on its newly characterized secretory function is unknown. Here, we examined the effects of fibronectin and collagen types I, III, and V on IL-1beta-dependent secretory responses of human ASM cells, and characterized the involvement of specific integrins. Cytokine production (eotaxin, RANTES, and GM-CSF) was evaluated by ELISA, RT-PCR, and flow cytometry. Function-blocking integrin mAbs and RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp)-blocking peptides were used to identify integrin involvement. IL-1beta-dependent release of eotaxin, RANTES, and GM-CSF was enhanced by fibronectin and by fibrillar and monomeric type I collagen, with similar changes in mRNA abundance. Collagen types III and V had no effect on eotaxin or RANTES release but did modulate GM-CSF. Analogous changes in intracellular cytokine accumulation were found, but in < 25% of the total ASM cell population. Function-blocking Ab and RGD peptide studies revealed that alpha(2)beta(1), alpha(5)beta(1), alpha(v)beta(1), and alpha(v)beta(3) integrins were required for up-regulation of IL-1beta-dependent ASM secretory responses by fibronectin, while alpha(2)beta(1) was an important transducer for type I collagen. Thus, fibronectin and type I collagen enhance IL-1beta-dependent ASM secretory responses through a beta(1) integrin-dependent mechanism. Enhancement of cytokine release from ASM by these ECM components may contribute to airway wall inflammation and remodeling in asthma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据