4.8 Review

Polyparameter linear free energy relationships for estimating the equilibrium partition of organic compounds between water and the natural organic matter in soils and sediments

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 39, 期 4, 页码 913-924

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es048839s

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Values of the organic-carbon-based partition coefficient (K-OC) have often been estimated using one-parameter linear free energy relationships (op-LFERs), which include both correlations between log K-OC and log K-OWi where K-OW is the octanol-water partition coefficient, and op-LFERs that are based on first-order molecular connectivity indices. For chemicals with tendencies toward strong hydrogen-bonding or other specific interactions with the organic phase, however, these methods are not sufficiently accurate. Polyparameter LFERs (pp-LFERs) address these shortcomings by explicitly considering contributions toward free energy change from multiple kinds of molecular interactions with both water and bulk organic phases. This paper reviews pp-LFER theory and presents the development of a new pp-LFER for organic chemical partitioning with soil/sediment organic matter (SOM) using a data set of 356 carefully selected experimental values of log K-OC for 75 chemicals, including apolar, monopolar, and bipolar compounds. The paradigm of representing SOM by a single pp-LFER is qualitatively supported by our results, and the set of coefficients for the regression log K-OC= (1.10 +/- 0.10)E - (0.72 +/- 0.14)S + (0.15 +/- 0.15)A - (1.98 +/- 0.14)B + (2.28 +/- 0.14)V + (0.14 +/- 0.10) represents a proposed set of water-SOM-specific properties for estimating log K-OC. The developed correlation outperformed other currently recommended approaches with the given K-OC data set and also compared favorably against the use of new multiple class-specific op-LFER regressions. Overall, the pp-LFER approach is recommended over other current methods for the purpose of K-OC estimation and especially for polar chemicals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据