4.8 Article

Functional characterization of EBV-encoded nuclear antigen 1-specific CD4+ helper and regulatory T cells elicited by in vitro peptide stimulation

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 65, 期 4, 页码 1577-1586

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2552

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA101795, CA90327, CA94237] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CD4(+) helper and regulatory T (Treg) cells play important but opposing roles in regulating host immune responses against cancer and other diseases. However, very little is known about the antigen specificity of CD4(+) Treg cells. Here we describe the generation of a panel of EBV-encoded nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1)-specific CD4+ T-cell lines and clones that recognize naturally processed EBNA1-P607-619 and -P561-573 peptides in the context of HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DR11, -DR12, and -DR13 molecules, respectively. Phenotypic and functional analyses of these CD4+ T cells revealed that they represent EBNA1-specific CD4(+) T helper as well as Treg cells. CD4(+) Treg cells do not secrete interleukin (IL)-10 and transforming growth factor 13 cytokines but express CD25, the glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor-related protein (GITR), and Forkhead Box P3 (Foxp3), and are capable of suppressing the proliferative responses of naive CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells to stimulation with mitogenic anti-CD3 antibody. The suppressive activity of these CD4+ Treg cells is mediated via cell-cell contact or in part by a cytokine-dependent manner. Importantly, these Treg cells suppress IL-2 secretion by CD4(+) effector T cells specific for either EBNA1 or a melanoma antigen, suggesting that these CD4+ Treg cells induce immune suppression. These observations suggest that the success of peptide-based vaccines against EBV-associated cancer and other diseases may likely depend upon our ability to identify antigens/peptides that preferentially activate helper T cells and/or to design strategies to regulate the balance between CD4(+) helper and Treg cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据