4.5 Article

Friedreich ataxia: the oxidative stress paradox

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 463-474

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddi042

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Friedreich ataxia (FRDA) results from a generalized deficiency of mitochondrial and cytosolic iron-sulfur protein activity initially ascribed to mitochondrial iron overload. Recent in vitro data suggest that frataxin is necessary for iron incorporation in Fe-S cluster (ISC) and heme biosynthesis. In addition, several reports suggest that continuous oxidative damage resulting from hampered superoxide dismutases (SODs) signaling participates in the mitochondrial deficiency and ultimately the neuronal and cardiac cell death. This has led to the use of antioxidants such as idebenone for FRDA therapy. To further discern the role of oxidative stress in FRDA pathophysiology, we have tested the potential effect of increased antioxidant defense using an MnSOD mimetic (MnTBAP) and Cu,ZnSOD overexpression on the murine FRDA cardiomyopathy. Surprisingly, no positive effect was observed, suggesting that increased superoxide production could not explain by itself the FRDA cardiac pathophysiology. Moreover, we demonstrate that complete frataxin-deficiency neither induces oxidative stress in neuronal tissues nor alters the MnSOD expression and induction in the early step of the pathology (neuronal and cardiac) as previously suggested. We show that cytosolic ISC aconitase activity of iron regulatory protein-1 progressively decreases, whereas its apo-RNA binding form increases despite the absence of oxidative stress, suggesting that in a mammalian system the mitochondrial ISC assembly machinery is essential for cytosolic ISC blogenesis. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that in FRDA, mitochondrial iron accumulation does not induce oxidative stress and we propose that, contrary to the general assumption, FRDA is a neurodegenerative disease not associated with oxidative damage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据