4.8 Article

N,N′-linked oligoureas as foldamers:: Chain length requirements for helix formation in protic solvent investigated by circular dichroism, NMR spectroscopy, and molecular dynamics

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 127, 期 7, 页码 2156-2164

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja044392b

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

N,N'-Linked oligoureas with proteinogenic side chains are peptide backbone mimetics belonging to the gamma-peptide lineage. In pyridine, heptamer 4 adopts a stable helical fold reminiscent of the 2.6(14) helical structure proposed for gamma-peptide foldamers. In the present study, we have used a combination of CD and NMR spectroscopies to correlate far-UV chiroptical properties and conformational preferences of oligoureas as a function of chain length from tetramer to nonamer. Both the intensity of the CD spectra and NMR chemical shift differences between (CH2)-C-alpha diastereotopic protons experienced a marked increase for oligomers between four and seven residues. No major change in CD spectra occurred between seven and nine residues, thus suggesting that seven residues could be the minimum length required for stabilizing a dominant conformation. Unexpectedly, in-depth NMR conformational investigation of heptamer 4 in CD3-OH revealed that the 2.5 helix probably coexists with partially (un)folded conformations and that Z-E urea isomerization occurs, to some degree, along the backbone. Removing unfavorable electrostatic interactions at the amino terminal end of 4 and adding one H-bond acceptor by acylation with alkyl isocyanate (4 --> 7) was found to reinforce the 2.5 helical population. The stability of the 2.5 helical fold in MeOH is further discussed in light of unrestrained molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. Taken together, these new data provide additional insight into the folding propensity of oligoureas in protic solvent and should be of practical value for the design of helical bioactive oligoureas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据