4.7 Article

Dietary L-ascorbic acid affects growth, nonspecific immune responses and disease resistance in juvenile grouper, Epinephelus malabaricus

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 244, 期 1-4, 页码 215-221

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.10.026

关键词

grouper; fish; vitamin c; nonspecific immune response

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An 8-week feeding trial was conducted to estimate the adequate dietary L-ascorbic acid (AA) requirements of juvenile grouper and its effect on nonspecific immune responses and disease resistance when challenged with Vibrio carchariae. AA supplemented at 0, 20, 50, 80, 150, 250, 400 and 800 mg/kg diet in the basal diet providing of 0, 3, 14, 27, 46, 76, 135 and 288 AA mg/kg diet, respectively. Each diet was fed to triplicate groups of grouper with initial body weight of 7.58+/-0.05 g. Fish fed diets supplemented with greater than or equal to46 mg AA/kg had significantly (P<0.05) greater weight gain (WG) and feed efficiency (FE) than fish fed diets with less than or equal to14 mg AA/kg. After the final weighing, 10 fish were randomly taken from each aquarium and injected with V carchariae. Mortality was recorded daily for 7 days and nonspecific immune parameters were monitored in the remaining fish. Higher cumulative mortality was in fish fed the unsupplemented diet or the 3-mg AA/kg diet than other dietary groups. Fish fed the 288-mg AA/kg diet had higher respiratory burst activity (superoxide O-2(-)) of head kidney leukocytes and alternative complement activity than fish fed the unsupplemented diet and diets with less than or equal to76 mg AA/kg, respectively. Lysozyme activity was higher in fish fed diets with greater than or equal to76 mg AA than fish fed diets with less than or equal to27 mg AA/kg. These data indicated that the adequate dietary AA concentration for optimum growth of juvenile grouper is 45.3 mg AA/kg diet, and six times the optimum dietary AA level was needed to enhance the nonspecific immune responses and maintain survival of the fish infected with bacteria. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据