4.4 Article

Early-stage visual processing deficits in schizophrenia

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 151-157

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00001504-200503000-00008

关键词

magnocellular; parvocellular; schizophrenia; visual evoked potentials

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [K02 MH001439-10, R37 MH049334-16, K02 MH001439, R37 MH049334, R01 MH066374, R01 MH066374-04] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review While cognitive dysfunction including memory and attentional deficits are well known in schizophrenia, recent work has also shown basic sensory processing deficits. Deficits are particularly prominent in the visual system and may be related to cognitive deficits and outcome. This article reviews studies of early-stage visual processing in schizophrenia published during the past year. These studies I reflect the growing interest and importance of sensory processing deficits in schizophrenia. Recent findings The visual system is divided into magnocellular and parvocellular pathways which project to dorsal and ventral visual areas. Recent electrophysiological and behavioral investigations have found preferential magnocellular/dorsal stream dysfunction, with some deficits in parvocellular function as well. These early-stage deficits appear to be related to higher level cognitive, social, and community function. Structural studies of occipital cortex and particularly optic radiations provide anatomical support for earl visual processing dysfunction. Summary These findings highlight the importance of sensory processing deficits, in addition to higher cognitive dysfunction, for understanding the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Understanding the nature of sensory processing deficits may provide insight into mechanisms of pathology in schizophrenia, such as N-methyl-D-aspartate dysfunction or impaired signal amplification, and could lead to treatment strategies including sensory processing rehabilitation that may improve outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据