4.5 Article

Reduced 2,4-dinitro-1-fluorobenzene-induced contact hypersensitivity response in IL-15 receptor α-deficient mice correlates with diminished CCL5/RANTES and CXCL10/IP-10 expression

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 690-698

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.200425577

关键词

chemokines; IL-15 receptor; contact hypersensitivity; inflammation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using a model of 2,4-dinitro-1-fluorobenzene-induced contact hypersensitivity (CHS) we found that, as compared with wild-type mice, IL-15 receptor alpha chain (IL-15R alpha)-deficient mice showed significantly less ear swelling. This decreased response was associated with diminished expression of CCL5/RANTES and CXCL10/IP-10, chemokines critical for effector cell recruitment, in the inflamed tissue. We determined that both the number of CD8(+) T cells infiltrating the affected skin and the production of CCL5/RANTES by antigen-stimulated CD8(+) T cells were decreased in IL-15R alpha(-/-) mice. The lower levels of CXCL10/IP-10 suggested that the IL-15R alpha(-/-) mice had reduced production of IFN-gamma, the primary inducer of CXCL10/IP-10, which was in fact the case. However, by contrast with CCL5/RANTES, the diminished levels of IFN-gamma were likely due to the decreased number of skin-infiltrating CD8(+) T cells, since IFN-y production by antigen-stimulated CD8(+) T cells was comparable between wild-type and IL-15R alpha(-/-) mice. Our data suggest a positive, pro-inflammatory feedback loop involving CCL5/ RANTES, IFN-y and CXCL10/IP-10 that underlies the CHS reaction and that is disrupted, likely primarily by a defect in CCL5/RANTES production, in mice lacking IL-15R alpha, resulting in impaired leukocyte recruitment and inflammation. Moreover, it is particularly noteworthy that the defect in CCL5/RANTES expression in CD8(+) T cells is intrinsic to the absence of IL-15R alpha, indicating that IL-15R alpha is critical for CCL5/ RANTES expression in CD8(+) T cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据