4.6 Article

Intraoperative facial motor evoked potential monitoring with transcranial electrical stimulation during skull base surgery

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 116, 期 3, 页码 588-596

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.09.013

关键词

transcranial electrical stimulation; motor evoked potential; intraoperative facial nerve monitoring; electromyography; skull base surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To address the limitations of standard electromyography (EMG) facial nerve monitoring techniques by exploring the novel application of multi-pulse transcranial electrical stimulation (mpTES) to myogenic facial motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring. Methods: In 76 patients undergoing skull base surgery, mpTES was delivered through electrodes 1 cm anterior to C1 and C2 (M1-M2), C3 and C4 (M3-M4) or C3 or C4 and Cz (M3/M4-Mz), with the anode contralateral to the operative side. Facial MEPs were monitored from the orbicularis oris muscle on the operative side. Distal facial nerve excitation was excluded by the absence of single pulse responses and by onset latency consistent with a central origin. Results: M3/M4-Mz mpTES (n = 50) reliably produced facial MEPs while M1-M2 (n = 18) or M3-M4 (n = 8) stimulation produced 6 technical failures. Facial MEPs could be successfully monitored in 21 of 22 patients whose proximal facial nerves were inaccessible to direct stimulation. Using 50, 35 and 0% of baseline amplitude criteria, significant facial deficits were predicted with a sensitivity/specificity of 1.00/0.88, 0.91/0.97 and 0.64/1.00, respectively. Conclusions: Facial MEPs can provide an ongoing surgeon-independent assessment of facial nerve function and predict facial nerve outcome with sufficiently useful accuracy. Significance: This method substantially improves facial nerve monitoring during skull base surgery. (c) 2004 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据