4.7 Article

Nutritional and cognitive relationships and long-term mortality in patients with various dementia disorders

期刊

AGE AND AGEING
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 136-141

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afi023

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; cognition; dementia; nutrition; survival; elderly

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: subjects with dementia are at risk for protein-energy malnutrition. Objective: to study the nutritional status, the short-term effects of adapted nutritional routines and the long-term mortality in subjects admitted for evaluation of cognitive dysfunction. Design: prospective observational study. Setting: University Hospital. Subjects: a total of 231 patients (80 +/- 7 years, 65% women). Methods: Body mass index (BMI, kg/m(2)), serum concentrations of albumin, ferritin, vitamin B-12, folic acid and haemoglobin as well as Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE, 0-30 p) results and co-morbidity were recorded at hospital admittance and before discharge. Seven years later, mortality was registered. Results: mean BMI was in the normal range (23.3 +/- 4) as were the biochemical indices, and they did not vary among patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), vascular dementia (VaD), mild cognitive impairment, mixed dementia and other diagnoses. A BMI of <23 was found in 108 (52%) subjects. Weight and MMSE score correlated weakly (r=0.18, P<0.01) at inclusion. During a median hospital stay of 3 weeks, an average weight gain of 0.5 +/- 1.8 kg (P<0.001) and an increase in MMSE score of 0.9 +/- 3 (P<0.001) was observed. However, these changes did not correlate. A BMI of <23 was associated with an increased risk for 7-year mortality (OR 3, 95% CI = 1.3-6.7), which was independent of age, male gender, dementia diagnosis and co-morbidity. Conclusions: nutritional status did not vary in patients with various dementia diagnoses. A BMI of <23 was related to reduced 7-year survival, but this result was independent of co-morbidity, male gender and age.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据