4.7 Article

Exercise is required for visceral fat loss in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 90, 期 3, 页码 1511-1518

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2004-1782

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the effects of aerobic exercise without weight loss, a hypocaloric high monounsaturated fat diet, and diet plus exercise ( D + E) on total abdominal and visceral fat loss in obese postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes. Thirty-three postmenopausal women ( body mass index, 34.6 +/- 1.9 kg/m(2)) were assigned to one of three interventions: a hypocaloric high monounsaturated fat diet alone, exercise alone ( EX), and D + E for 14 wk. Aerobic capacity, body composition, abdominal fat distribution ( magnetic resonance imaging), glucose tolerance, and insulin sensitivity were measured preand postintervention. Body weight ( similar to 4.5 kg) and percent body fat ( similar to 5%) were decreased ( P < 0.05) with the D and D + E intervention, whereas only percent body fat ( similar to 2.3%) decreased with EX. Total abdominal fat and sc adipose tissue ( SAT) were reduced with the D and D + E interventions ( P< 0.05), whereas visceral adipose tissue ( VAT) decreased with the D + E and EX intervention, but not with the D intervention. EX resulted in a reduction in total abdominal fat, VAT, and SAT ( P < 0.05) despite the lack of weight loss. The reductions in total abdominal fat and SAT explained 32.7% and 9.7%, respectively, of the variability in the changes in fasting glucose levels, whereas the reductions in VAT explained 15.9% of the changes in fasting insulin levels ( P < 0.05). In conclusion, modest weight loss, through either D or D + E, resulted in similar improvements in total abdominal fat, SAT, and glycemic status in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes; however, the addition of exercise to diet is necessary for VAT loss. These data demonstrate the importance of exercise in the treatment of women with type 2 diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据