4.7 Article

Biological evaluation of polyester dendrimer:: Poly(ethylene oxide) Bow-Tie hybrids with tunable molecular weight and architecture

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACEUTICS
卷 2, 期 2, 页码 129-138

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/mp049886u

关键词

drug delivery; polymer; dendrimer; tumor; biodistribution; biodegradable

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM 65361, EB 002047]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High molecular weight (MW) polymers have shown promise in terms of improving the properties and the efficacy of low MW therapeutics. However, new systems that are highly biocompatible, are biodegradable, have well-defined MW, and have multiple functional groups for drug attachment are still needed. The biological evaluation of a library of eight polyester dendrimer-polyethylene oxide) (PEO) bow-tie hybrids is described here. The group of evaluated polymers was designed to include a range of MWs (from 20000 to 160000) and architectures with the number of PEO arms ranging from two to eight. In vitro experiments revealed that the polymers were nontoxic to cells and were degraded to lower MW species at pH 7.4 and pH 5.0. Biodistribution studies with I-125-radiolabeled polymers showed that the high MW carriers (>40000) exhibited long circulation half-lives. Comparison of the renal clearances for the four-arm versus eight-arm polymers indicated that the more branched polymers were excreted more slowly into the urine, a result attributed to their decreased flexibility. Due to their essentially linear architecture that does not provide for good isolation of the iodinated phenolic moieties, the polymers with two arms were rapidly taken up by the liver. The biodistributions of two long-circulating high MW polymers in mice bearing subcutaneous B16F10 tumors were evaluated, and high levels of tumor accumulation were observed. These new carriers are therefore promising for applications in drug delivery and are also useful for improving our understanding of the effect of polymer architecture on pharmacokinetic properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据