4.5 Article

Nano- to microscale dynamics of P-selectin detachment from leukocyte interfaces. II. Tether flow terminated by P-selectin dissociation from PSGL-1

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 88, 期 3, 页码 2299-2308

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.104.051706

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL65333, R01 HL031579, R01 HL065333, HL31579] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have used a biomembrane force probe decorated with P-selectin to form point attachments with PSGL-1 receptors on a human neutrophil (PMN) in a calcium-containing medium and then to quantify the forces experienced by the attachment during retraction of the PMN at fixed speed. From first touch to final detachment, the typical force history exhibited the following sequence of events: i), an initial linear-elastic displacement of the PMN surface, ii), an abrupt crossover to viscoplastic flow that signaled membrane separation from the interior cytoskeleton and the beginning of a membrane tether, and iii), the final detachment from the probe tip most often by one precipitous step of P- selectin: PSGL-1 dissociation. Analyzing the initial elastic response and membrane unbinding from the cytoskeleton in our companion article I, we focus in this article on the regime of tether extrusion that nearly always occurred before release of the extracellular adhesion bond at pulling speeds greater than or equal to1 mum/s. The force during tether growth appeared to approach a plateau at long times. Examined over a large range of pulling speeds up to 150 mum/s, the plateau force exhibited a significant shear thinning as indicated by a weak power-law dependence on pulling speed, f(infinity) = 60 pN(mu(pull)/mum/s)(0.25). Using this shear-thinning response to describe the viscous element in a nonlinear Maxwell-like fluid model, we show that a weak serial-elastic component with a stiffness of similar to0.07 pN/nm provides good agreement with the time course of the tether force approach to the plateau under constant pulling speed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据