4.2 Review

Generation of loss of heterozygosity and its dependency on p53 status in human lymphoblastoid cells

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS
卷 45, 期 2-3, 页码 162-176

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/em.20113

关键词

loss of heterozygosity; p53; DNA double-strand breaks; DNA repair; recombination; genomic stability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is a critical event in the development of human cancers. LOH is thought to result from either a large deletion or recombination between homologous alleles during repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). These types of genetic alterations produce mutations in the TK gene mutation assay, which detects a wide mutational spectrum, ranging from point mutations to LOH-type mutations. TK6, a human lymphoblastoid cell line, is heterozygous for the thymidine kinase (TK) gene and has a wild-type p53 gene. The related cell lines, TK6-E6 and WTK-1, which are p53-deficient and p53-mutant (Ile237), respectively, are also heterozygous for the TK gene and LOH-type mutation can be detected in these cells. Therefore, comparative studies of TK mutation frequency and spectrum with these cell lines are useful for elucidating the role of p53 in generating LOH and maintaining genomic stability in human cells. We demonstrate here that LOH and its associated genomic instability strongly depend on the p53 status in these cells. TK6-E6 and WTK-1 are defective in the G1/S checkpoint and in apoptosis. Unrepaired DSBs that escape from the checkpoint can potentially initiate genomic instability after DNA replication, resulting in LOH and a variety of chromosome changes. Moreover, genomic instability is enhanced in WTK-1 cells. It is likely that the mutant p53 protein in WTK-1 cells increases LOH in a dominant-negative manner due to its abnormal recombination capacity. We discuss the mutator phenotype and genomic instability associated with p53 inactivation with the goal of elucidating the mechanisms of mutation and DNA repair in untargeted mutagenesis. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 45:162-176, 2005. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据