4.5 Article

Histamine improves survival and protects against interleukin-2-induced pulmonary vascular leak syndrome in mice

期刊

VASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 42, 期 4, 页码 187-193

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.vph.2005.02.011

关键词

histamine; immunotherapy; interleukin-2; reactive oxygen species

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of metastatic cancer with high doses of interleukin-2 (IL-2) has been limited by the onset of vascular leak syndrome (VLS) and related toxicities. VLS is characterized by an increase in vascular permeability and severe hypotension resulting in interstitial edema and organ failure. This study explores the protective effects of histamine dihydrochloride (HDC) against IL-2-induced toxicities in mice. Treatment with HDC administered before or after IL-2 (1.25 x 10(6) IU, BID) was shown to protect mice from VLS-related toxicities and mortality in a dose-dependent manner. Survival rates when HDC was added were 56, 75 and 81% at doses of 0.47, 4.7 and 47.0 mg/kg, respectively, compared to 42% survival with IL-2 alone. HDC protected against IL-2-induced macroscopic pulmonary lesions, reduced edema (up to 62% reduction in lung wet/dry weight ratio) and reduced capillary leakage into the lungs as measured by a reduction in Evans Blue dye content. In addition, the systemic effect on serum cytokine levels showed that HDC only moderately lowered IL-2 induced IFN-gamma, IL-6, IL-10. IL-18 and TNF-alpha. Serum levels of IL-1 beta, IL-4 and IL-12 were not measurably induced by IL-2 treatment. HDC modulates many cellular functions including regulating cytokines and blocking immune-suppression caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by the NADPH oxidase. However, the protective effect of HDC on alleviating IL-2-induced pulmonary edema was not related to ROS inhibition. Our data indicate that HDC treatment improves survival and protects against IL-2 induced VLS independent of ROS regulation in mice. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据