4.7 Article

Effect of TCDD on mRNA expression-of genes encoding bHLH/PAS proteins in rat hypothalamus

期刊

TOXICOLOGY
卷 208, 期 1, 页码 1-11

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2004.11.003

关键词

2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin; rat; hypothalamus; bHLH/PAS proteins; gene expression; species differences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) brings about a wide variety of toxic and biochemical effects via an AH receptor (AHR)-mediated signalling pathway. Wasting syndrome and acute lethality are TCDD-induced endpoints showing a striking sensitivity difference between two rat strains, TCDD-sensitive Long-Evans (Turku/AB) (L-E) and TCDD-resistant Han/Wistar (Kuopio) (H/W). These rat strains were used to study hypothalamic effects of TCDD on expression of genes encoding AHR-regulated bHLH/PAS proteins potentially involved in molecular pathogenesis of the wasting syndrome. In addition, two well-established target genes of TCDD, CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 were also examined. Quantitative RT-PCR was used to measure mRNA levels in hypothalamus, which is a major center of food intake and body weight regulation. At both 6 and 96 It after a single dose of 50 mug/kg TCDD, significant elevations were found in mRNA levels of AHR repressor (AHRR), CYP1A1 and CYP1A2, but not those of AHR, ARNT or ARNT2. Likewise, TCDD (100 mug/kg) did not alter the expression of SIM1, implicated in the suppressive impact of TCDD on food intake, nor that of PER2, involved in regulation of circadian rhythms. Differences between H/W and L-E rats appeared in constitutive levels of AHR and ARNT and in TCDD-induced levels of CYP1A2, AHRR, AHR and ARNT, which all were about two- to four-fold lower in H/W rats. Thus, although the changes found do not account for the wasting syndrome, expression of all principal genes of the AHR-signalling pathway in rat hypothalamus make it a candidate target for TCDD. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据