4.2 Article

Detection of IgG binding to Schistosoma mansoni recombinant protein RP26 is a sensitive and specific method for acute schistosomiasis diagnosis

期刊

PARASITOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 54, 期 1, 页码 69-74

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parint.2004.12.001

关键词

RP26; Schistosoma mansoni; acute schistosomiasis diagnosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We recently described the first recombinant Schistosoma mansoni protein RP26, which was capable of acute infection diagnosis. The aim of the present work was to further characterize the RP26 diagnostic properties in immunoblot and enzyme-linked inummosorbent (ELISA) assays. Testing sera from uninfected donors and sera from patients with acute or chronic Schistosoma infection by Western blot immunoassay revealed 100% specificity and 100% sensitivity for acute infection identification. Sera from uninfected, acute, and chronic schistosomiasis were also probed for IgG, IgG4, IgA, and IgM reactivity to R-P26 plus soluble egg antigens (SEA) in ELISA. The mean IgG reactivity to RP26 by sera from acute schistosomiasis patients was significantly higher than the chronic ones. The IgG4, IgA, and IgM reactivities to RP26 were low and similar in both infected groups. The mean IgA and IgM reactivities to SEA were significantly higher in the group of acute compared to chronic group, whereas mean IgG4 reactivity was higher in chronic group. To estimate the specificity of Schistosoma infection diagnosis sera from patients infected with other different parasites were tested to detect IgG reactivity to RP26 and IgA and IgM reactivity to SEA. For IgA against SEA detection, 72% of sera were positive and 48% of sera were positive for IgM detection. Based on these results we can suggest that detection of sera IgG binding to RP26 is a sensitive and specific method for acute schistosomiasis diagnosis. Therefore, RP26 is a candidate for immumodiagnostic kit development. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据