4.6 Article

Correlation between infant birth weight and mother's periodontal status

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 299-304

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00661.x

关键词

low birth weight; periodontal disease/adverse effects; pregnancy; preterm birth; risk factors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Recent studies have suggested that periodontal disease is a risk factor for low birth weight (LBW) with other multiple factors. A cross-sectional study was undertaken to help further evaluate the proposed association between periodontal disease and infant birth weight. Material and Methods: Caucasian pregnant women (n=152), aged 14-39 years, were enrolled while receiving prenatal care. Dental plaque, probing depth, bleeding on probing and clinical attachment level were recorded and three groups were made: healthy group (HG) (n=38), gingivitis group (GG) (n=71) and periodontitis group (PG) (n=43). At delivery, birth weight was recorded. Results: Infant mean weight at delivery was 3293.9 +/- 508.1 g. The total incidence of preterm birth and LBW infants was 5.3% and 4.6%, respectively. The incidence of LBW infants was 3.5% in term gestations and 25% in preterm gestations. Mothers height correlated with infant birth weight (p=0.03). Significant difference in birth weight existed between mothers with < 1.55 m (3229.23 +/- 462.57) and those with >= 1.65 m (3475.55 +/- 505.07). In the group of women > 25 years old infant mean weight in HG was 3588.33 +/- 531.83, being lower in GG (3466.75 +/- 334.45) and even lower (3092.60 +/- 592.94) in PG (p=0.0198). Bleeding on probing was significantly greater in women with < 2500 g infants (40.2 +/- 21.8%) compared with 2500-3499 g (18.6 +/- 15.1%) and >= 3500 g (17.1 +/- 16.1%) (p=0.009). Conclusions: Periodontal disease in normal Caucasian pregnant women, older than 25 years, is statistically associated with a reduction in the infant birth weight. These data provide new evidence on the relationship between periodontal disease and birth weight.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据