4.7 Article

Mitochondrial DNA 3243A>G mutation and increased expression of LARS2 gene in the brains of patients with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 57, 期 5, 页码 525-532

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.11.041

关键词

DNA microarray; leucyl-tRNA synthetase 2; mitochondrial (LARS2); aminoacylation; mitochondrial DNA 3243A > G; peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-clamped PCR; postmortem brain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Accumulating evidence suggests mitochondrial dysfunction in bipolar disorder. Analyses of mitochondria-related genes using DNA microarray showed significantly increased LARS2 (mitochondrial leucyl-tRNA synthetase) in the postmortem prefrontal cortices of patients with bipolar disorder provided by the Stanley Foundation Brain Collection. LARS2 is a nuclear gene encoding the enzyme catalyzing the aminoacylation of mitochondrial tRNA(Leu). A well-studied mitochondrial DNA point mutation, 3243A>G, in the region of tRNA(Leu (UUR)), related with MELAS (mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes), is known to decrease the efficiency of aminoacylation of tRNA(Leu (UUR)). Methods. The steady state level of LARS2 was examined in the transmitochondrial cybrids carrying 3243A>G. We examined the 3243A>G mutation in these brains using the peptide nucleic acid-clamped polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism method. Results. LARS2 was upregulated in the transmitochrondrial cybrids carrying 3243A>G. The 3243A>G was detected in the postmortem brains of two patients with bipolar disorder and one with schizophrenia. These patients also showed higher levels of the mutation in their livers and significantly higher gene expression of LARS2 compared with other subjects. Conclusions: These results suggest that upregulation of LARS2 is a hallmark of 324A>G mutation. The accumulation of 3243A>G mutation in the brain may have a pathophysiologic role in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据