4.6 Article

Association between fish consumption and all-cause and cause-specific mortatity in Japan: NIPPON DATA80, 1980-99

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 118, 期 3, 页码 239-245

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.12.016

关键词

fish; epidemiology; Japanese; all-cause mortality; coronary heart disease; cerebral infarction; cerebral hemorrhage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: Although high consumption of fish may be one of the contributing factors for Japanese longevity, no epidemiological study using Japanese data has tested this hypothesis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The relationship between fish Consumption and all-cause as well as cause-specific mortality was analyzed using the database of NIPPON DATA80. At baseline in 1980, history, physical, and blood biochemical measurement and a nutritional survey by the food-frequency method were performed in randomly selected coin in unity-based Subjects aged 30 years and over in Japan. After exclusion of subjects with significant comorbidities at baseline, we followed 3 945 men and 4 934 women for 19 years. Men and women were analyzed comprehensively. Age- and sex-adjusted and multivariate adjusted relative risk for all-cause or cause-specific mortality was calculated using a Cox proportional hazards model with delayed entry. RESULTS: During 19 years of followup, there were 1 745 deaths. Subjects were divided into 5 groups according to fish consumption frequency. The multivariate Cox analyses showed that relative risks for subjects who ate fish more than twice daily compared with those of subjects who ate I to 2 times weekly were 0.99 (95% confidence intervals: 0.77-1.27) for all-cause, 1.26 (0.70-2.29) for stroke, 0.92 (0.20-4.23) for cerebral hemorrhage, 1.09 (0.48-2.43) for cerebral infarction, and 0.91 (0.35-2.35) for coronary heart disease mortality. CONCLUSION: Our results did not provide evidence in support of the fish hypothesis, perhaps because the majority of the Japanese Subjects in the Study ate fish more than the threshold level shown to be beneficial in the previous Studies. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据