4.7 Article

Impact of modeling and excitation uncertainties on operational and structural reliability of tension leg platforms

期刊

APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH
卷 43, 期 -, 页码 131-147

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2013.08.004

关键词

Tension leg platform; Reliability; Modeling uncertainties; Excitation uncertainties; Stochastic simulation; Probabilistic global sensitivity analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During their operation life-cycle, tension leg platforms (TLPs) may experience, under wave and wind loading, response amplitudes that affect their operational and structural reliability. Uncertainties related to the excitation characteristics (for example significant wave height or zero up-crossing period) or to the TLP model properties (for example modulus of elasticity for tendons or location of center of mass) significantly impact the predicted dynamic response of the platform and ultimately the calculated reliability, or more generally the TLP-risk. A simulation-based, probabilistic framework is discussed here for detailed estimation of this risk and for identification of the importance of the different uncertain model parameters (i.e. risk factors). The TLP-risk is quantified as the expected value, over the established probability distributions for these uncertain parameters, of some chosen risk consequence measure. It is calculated using stochastic (Monte Carlo) simulation, which imposes no constraints on the complexity of the models considered and can facilitate an accurate estimation exploiting recent development in computer and computational science. The identification of the importance of the risk factors is established using an efficient, sampling-based global sensitivity analysis. An illustrative example is discussed in which risk is quantified in terms of the reliability for the structural integrity and operational serviceability for a rectangular TLP. The impact of uncertainties related to the excitation and TLP models is separately addressed, whereas the influence on the estimated risk of model prediction errors is also examined. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据