4.4 Review

Ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in health among patients with rheumatic disease

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 147-152

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.bor.0000151403.18651.de

关键词

African America; health disparities; Hispanic; socioeconomic status

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review To describe recent studies of differences in the occurrence and outcomes of rheumatic diseases and differences in treatment by ethnic group or socioeconomic status. Recent findings African Americans and Hispanics in the United States have consistently been found to have higher prevalences of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions than whites and also generally have more activity limitations in the setting of rheumatic disease. Variations in disease occurrence by socioeconomic status have not been studies extensively. African Americans with osteoarthritis were less likely than whites to be treated with narcotic analgesics. Rates of total knee or hip arthroplasty were found to be substantially lower among African Americans and Hispanics than among whites in the United States, and lower among those of low socioeconomic status in the United Kingdom. Ethnic differences in use of arthroplasty have been associated with less willingness of African Americans to have surgery, which has been related to perceptions of uncertain benefits of surgery. Poverty and ethnicity had important associations with the activity of systemic lupus erythematosus, whereas socioeconomic status was a more important predictor of mortality in these patients. Treatment adherence was similar in African American and white patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, but barriers to adherence differed by ethnic group. Summary Ethnic disparities in health have been more extensively studied than socioeconomic disparities. Most studies only describe the disparities, but several studies have begun to investigate potential reasons for the disparities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据