4.2 Article

Adenosine and the regulation of cerebral blood flow

期刊

NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 175-181

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1179/016164105X21931

关键词

adenosine; hypercapnoea; cerebral blood flow; nitric oxide; coronary blood flow

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: This review summarizes the 30 year effort of my collaborator and mentor Dr J. W. Phillis to establish the role of adenosine in the regulation of cerebral blood flow. Methods: While most of the experiments described utilized the rat cerebral cortex as a model, several different and complementary methodologies were employed. Superfusate samples were collected from the cortical surface and analysed for purines using HPLC. Laser-Doppler flowmetry was utilized to measure blood flow in the pial vasculature, while pial diameters were monitored by videomicroscopy. An additional series of experiments looked at coronary blood flow in a Langendorff preparation. Results: Adenosine is released from the cortex in response to decreased nutrient supply (hypoxial ischemia) and during conditions that mimic alterations in the extracellular environment associated with increased metabolism. The application of pharmacological agents that alter adenosine metabolism resulted in the appropriate alterations in ECF adenosine levels and also in blood flow. Selective blockade of the adenosine A(2A) receptor reduced the pial vasodilation evoked by hypercapnoea. Results from the isolated rat heart, utilizing similar agents, support a role for adenosine in the regulation of coronary blood flow during respiratory and metabolic acidosis. Discussion: Adenosine is released when there is a mismatch between supply and demand. If the effects of adenosine are blocked with receptor antagonists, the vasodilation is also reduced. However, the effects of adenosine on the hyperemia evoked by hypercapnoea are complicated by the arousal evoked by adenosine receptor antagonists and the effects of upstream regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据