4.6 Article

Percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol rhizotomy in the treatment of tic douloureux associated with multiple sclerosis

期刊

NEUROSURGERY
卷 56, 期 3, 页码 537-543

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000153907.43563.FF

关键词

glycerol rhizotomy; multiple sclerosis; tic douloureux; trigeminal neuralgia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have a relatively high incidence of tic clouloureux (TD) and often do not tolerate medical therapy well. The minimally invasive nature of percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol rhizotomy (PRGR) renders it ideal for first-line surgical treatment of TD. We sought to ascertain the benefits of PRGR in patients with MS and to determine whether hypalgesia after PRGR correlates with efficacy. METHODS: We assessed 97 glycerol procedures performed in 53 patients followed prospectively for treatment of TD associated with MS. Factors assessed included degree of pain relief, postoperative hypalgesia, procedural morbidity, medication use, time to pain recurrence, and number and type of subsequent procedures. RESULTS: Complete pain relief was obtained in 78% of patients after the initial glycerol injection, and partial relief was obtained in 13% of patients. Long-term follow-up (mean, 81 mo) demonstrated a recurrence rate of 59%, with a mean time to recurrence of 17 months. Actuarial recurrence rates were 50% at 12 months and 60% at 24 months. Twenty-four patients underwent a second or subsequent PRGR for recurrent pain and achieved similar rates of pain relief and time to recurrence. Facial sensory loss was associated with a higher likelihood of pain relief (P < 0.05), with longer time to pain recurrence (P < 0.05), and with decreased use of medication after surgery (P < 0.01.) CONCLUSION: PRGR is an effective, low-morbidity surgical procedure in the management of TD complicating MS. The presence of facial sensory loss after PRGR is associated with prolonged efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据