4.7 Article

Phase I study of a MUC1 vaccine composed of different doses of MUC1 peptide with SB-AS2 adjuvant in resected and locally advanced pancreatic cancer

期刊

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
卷 54, 期 3, 页码 254-264

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-004-0581-1

关键词

clinical trial; immune response; pancreatic cancer; peptide vaccine

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [5M01 RR 00056] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MUC1 is a glycoprotein overexpressed in tumors as a hypoglycosylated form. A vaccine composed of a 100 - amino acid peptide corresponding to five 20 amino acid long repeats, and SB-AS2 adjuvant, was tested in a phase I study for safety, toxicity, and ability to elicit or boost MUC1-specific immune responses. Patients with resected or locally advanced pancreatic cancer without prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy were eligible. Escalating doses of the peptide ( 100, 300, 1,000, and 3,000 etag) were admixed with SB-AS2 and administered intramuscularly every 3 weeks for three doses, in cohorts of four patients. Sixteen patients were enrolled. Common adverse effects were grade 1 flu-like symptoms, tenderness, and erythema at the injection site. Delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) sites showed few or no T cells prevaccination (Pre V), but increased T-cell infiltration postvaccination (Post V). There was an increase in the percentage of CD8(+) T cells in the peripheral blood Post V. An increase in total MUC1-specific antibody was seen in some patients, and several patients developed IgG antibody. Two of 15 resected pancreatic cancer patients are alive and disease free at follow-up of 32 and 61 months. MUC1 100mer peptide with SB-AS2 adjuvant is a safe vaccine that induces low but detectable mucin-specific humoral and T-cell responses in some patients. No difference was seen between different peptide doses. Further evaluation is warranted to examine the effect on disease-free survival and overall survival, especially in early disease and in the absence of immunosuppressive standard therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据